Support us

Genomic instability and carcinogenesis

Genomic instability is a hallmark of human cancer. But how does genomic instability develop and impact the initiation and progression of cancer? And does it provide opportunities for therapeutic intervention? We study two causes of genomic instability, both related to perturbed DNA replication: (1) loss of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) leading to increased mutagenesis, and (2) defective G1/S control causing unscheduled S-phase entry, replication stress and DNA breakage. We develop novel gene modification tools to study genomic instability in cell culture and mouse models.


DNA MISMATCH REPAIR/LYNCH SYNDROME
Inherited defects in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes MSH2, MSH6, MLH1 or PMS2 underlie the cancer predisposition Lynch syndrome (LS), which manifests as early onset colorectal and endometrial cancer. Defective MMR leaves spontaneous DNA replication errors unnoticed, which strongly increases point-and frameshift mutagenesis.
MMR proteins also recognize damaged bases such as O6- or S6-methylguanine, that are formed by methylating compounds or the guanine analog 6-thioguanine (6TG), respectively. However, the processing of such lesions by MMR aggravates rather than attenuates their toxicity. Thus, defective MMR increases spontaneous mutagenesis and confers resistance to methylating agents.

Oligonucleotide-directed gene modification
As a spin-off of our work on MMR, we have developed a gene modification technique that allows substitution of any desired single base-pair without the need for prior generation of a DNA double-stranded break. The method only uses short synthetic oligodeoxyribonucleotides (ssODN) that are complementary to the endogenous target sequence except for the centrally located nucleotide that comprises the desired modification (Aarts and Te Riele, NAR 2010). Gene modification involves annealing of the ssODN to its complementary sequence in the replication fork and subsequent integration. However, the mismatch at the position of the mutating nucleotide elicits a MMR reaction that restricts gene modification to a frequency of 10-7 (Dekker et al., NAR 2003). Cells can be made permissive for ‘oligo targeting’ by transient suppression of MSH2 (Aarts et al., NAR 2006) or MLH1 (Dekker et al., Mutation Res 2011), increasing the frequency to 10-5 but at the cost of spontaneous, potentially confounding mutations. We found the effect of MMR can completely be avoided when the mutating nucleotide in the ssODN is a locked nucleic acid (LNA). LNA-modified ssODNs (LMOs) of only 21 nucleotides allow highly accurate base-pair substitution at frequencies of 10-3 in wild-type cells, while MMR suppresses off-target effects (Van Ravesteyn et al., PNAS 2016). The ssODN also contains an 5’ acridine group to improve annealing (Figure 1). Also in Escherichia coli the LMO design evades MMR during λ Red-mediated gene editing. While originally being developed in mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs), we recently extended oligo targeting to a human diploid cell line, that we termed DIP1.

Unclassified variants of MMR genes
We use oligo targeting to study so-called ‘variants of uncertain (clinical) significance’ (VUS) of MMR genes that are found in suspected LS patients. Evidently deleterious germ-line defects in MMR genes (e.g., protein-deleting or -truncating) allow for the clinical diagnosis LS and carriers can be offered surveillance to reduce cancer risk. However, single codon variants are difficult to interpret complicating the counseling of carriers as long as it is uncertain whether the variant is disease-causing or innocuous. To study such ‘Variants of uncertain significance’ (VUS), we developed an oligo-targeting-based screen: “oligonucleotide-directed mutation screening” (ODMS) (Houlleberghs et al., PNAS 2016; PLoS Genet 2017; J Med Genet 2020). In our current protocol, we first design an appropriate LMO to introduce the VUS into ±0. 1% of human diploid cells that were made hemizygous for a MMR gene. When the VUS is deleterious, modified cells form colonies in MNNG-containing medium; when no colonies appear, all cells remained MMR proficient indicating the VUS is innocuous. We are constantly improving this protocol and are implementing ODMS in clinical practice as a routine diagnostic tool with the help of a nationwide Dutch-Cancer-Society-sponsored consortium, termed INVUSE (“investigating variants of uncertain significance for use in clinical practice”).

CRISPR/Cas9-assisted gene modification
ssODN-mediated gene modification can also occur outside the context of DNA replication when stimulated by a CRISPR/Cas9-induced DNA break. Strikingly, DNA MMR impacts ssODN-directed gene modification without and with nuclease activity differently: while suppressing replication-coupled oligo targeting, break-assisted gene modification necessitates MMR to promote break-distal nucleotide substitution instructed by the 3’-half of the ssODN. This finding implies templated break repair rather than oligonucleotide integration to underlie CRISPR/Cas9-mediated nucleotide substitution (Harmsen et al., NAR 2018).

We corrected a disruptive mutation in the Fanconi anemia (FA) gene Fancf using CRISPR/Cas9 and a 120-nt ssODN template in mouse ESCs and fibroblasts. Although the frequency was low (3-6%), FA-corrected ESCs rapidly overgrew non-corrected cells, which even allowed recovery of very rare templated gene editing events obtained by using Cas9D10A nickase. Notably, unlike wild-type Cas9, nickase activity resulted in mono-allelic gene editing without undesired mutagenesis (Van de Vrugt et al., Sci Rep 2019).

A novel mouse model for Lynch syndrome
We generated a novel mouse model in which, similar to LS patients, MSH2-defective crypts arise amidst an excess of MMR-proficient crypts (ratio 1:20) (Wojciechowicz et al., Gastroenterology 2014). Half of these animals spontaneously developed MSH2-deficient intestinal tumors after ±1.5 year. Exposure of “Msh2-Lynch” mice to the methylating agent temozolomide caused 5-fold expansion of MSH2-deficient crypts and dramatically accelerated intestinal tumorigenesis, reducing the latency to ± 4 months in all animals. Exposure to methylating agents is clearly a risk factor for tumor development in LS patients. Remarkably, tumor incidence was strongly reduced when animals were sanitized and housed under SPF conditions. We are currently investigating which environmental factors impact tumor development. Ultimately this work may yield prophylactic strategies to reduce cancer risk in LS patients.

LOSS OF G1/S CONTROL
Loss of G1/S control is frequently seen in cancer. Genetic ablation of the retinoblastoma (Rb) proteins pRB, p107 and p130 disrupts G1/S control, causing unscheduled S-phase entry, but not indefinite proliferation. Apparently, additional events are needed for oncogenic transformation. To identify these, we study the cell cycle behavior of Rb-protein-defective cells.

Replication stress
Unscheduled S-phase entry, e.g., in the absence of mitogenic stimuli, of G1/S-checkpoint-defective cells causes replication stress, revealed by slow fork progression, low origin firing, DNA breakage and proliferative arrest (Foijer et al., Cancer Cell 2005; Van Harn et al., Genes Dev 2010). Strikingly, mitogen-independent proliferation was made possible by disruption of the Tp53/p21CIP1 axis, not only by attenuating the DNA damage response, but rather by restoring origin firing and reducing DNA breakage (Benedict et al., Elife 2018). However, replication speed remained low, indicative for sustained replication stress. We reasoned that proliferation under these conditions was dependent on cellular pathways that mitigate the deleterious consequences of replication stress. Indeed, we found that replication forks frequently collapse but are rapidly reinstalled by RAD51-dependent double-strand break repair that required WAPL-dependent removal of cohesion rings (Benedict et al., Dev Cell 2020). Furthermore, we found cohesion loss in many cancer cell lines, suggesting that active cohesion removal from newly synthesized sister chromatids is a widely-used strategy cancer cells use to handle oncogene-induced DNA replication stress.
Subsequent genetic dropout screens revealed additional vulnerabilities of cancer cells suffering from replication stress. that may provide novel leads towards anti-proliferative therapy. E.g., we found a requirement for the helicase RECQL that prevents replication fork collapse by inhibiting MRE11 nuclease activity (Benedict et al., Life Sci Alliance 2020; Figure 2).

 

This site uses cookies

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.