More drugs to target DNA errors
We are seeing a great number of newly developed cancer drugs that target specific DNA errors in a particular patient's tumor. This influx of new medicines can make things more challenging for molecular pathologists, as pathologists Kim Monkhorst and Gerrit Meijer know. The two of them led the WIDE trial, in collaboration with Hartwig Medical Foundation.
Monkhorst: "After a new lead for a drug has been discovered, pathologists will have to adapt their tests, which is a huge amount of work. By mapping out the entire tumor DNA at once through Whole Genome Sequencing, you can avoid that problem – one test and you’re done, now and in the future. Additionally, the WGS test delivers great quality.”
Couple of minor adjustments in method
Until now, Whole Genome Sequencing has been used primarily in clinical trials, such as the CPCT-02 and DRUP trials, in which patients received treatment regardless of their tumor type. In the WIDE study, the Netherlands Cancer Institute – in collaboration with Hartwig Medical Foundation – demonstrated that a few minor adjustments to the laboratory's working methods allowed this technique to be embedded perfectly in diagnostic pathology and in daily clinical practice. The researchers also validated the technique and showed that it offers added value to the diagnosis of metastatic cancer.
Frozen samples
For pathologists, the WGS test will mean working with frozen tissue samples instead of tissue fixed in formalin. Adapting the working method in the laboratory, which had been developed as part of the WIDE study, is quite feasible, as the study showed. The turnaround time of WGS diagnostics also appears to be comparable to that of current molecular diagnostics, which means that the wait time for physicians and patients won’t be longer than usual.
Reliable and enriching
In addition to being logistically and technically feasible, the WGS test also proved reliable in practice. To investigate the clinical validity of WGS diagnostics, the researchers compared them to the routine clinical diagnostics. “Our goal was a similarity of 95% in our results,” says Monkhorst. “But we ended up finding a similarity of 99.2%.”
The test appears to offer additional value when used in the clinic as well. 71% of evaluable patients ended up gaining one or more treatment options as a result of WGS, due to the discovery of a treatable DNA error. 24% of evaluable patients have been or are being treated based on the DNA error that was found.