search

menu

  • Research Research
    • Where science meets inspired minds

    • Back
    • Research
    • Our Science
    • Research Groups
    • Facilities & Platforms
    • Clinical research
    • Find a researcher
    • Publications
    • Knowledge Transfer
  • Careers & study Careers & study
    • Become a leader in cancer research

    • Back
    • Careers & study
    • Vacancies
    • Faculty
    • Scientific staff
    • Scientific support staff
    • Postdoctoral fellows
    • PhD Students
    • Operational staff
    • Clinical fellows
    • Life in Amsterdam
    • Student internships
  • News & Events News & Events
    • Check out our stories and events

    • Back
    • News & Events
    • News
    • Media & Press
    • Calendar
  • About us About us
    • Maximum impact for cancer patients

    • Back
    • About us
    • Our vision
    • Organization
    • Collaborations
    • Responsible Research
    • Support us
    • Visit us
    • Contact us
  • Support us
Support us
  • Home
  • Publications
  • Research
  • Publications
  • Article

Rechallenge of ipilimumab and nivolumab in advanced melanoma patients after previous ipilimumab-based therapy.

E J van Dijk ,
H H Nienhuis ,
A J M van den Eertwegh ,
M J Boers-Sonderen ,
M Bloem ,
A M Kamphuis ,
M M Ros ,
C Bos ,
M J B Aarts ,
F W P J van den Berkmortel ,
C U Blank ,
W A M Blokx ,
J W B de Groot ,
G A P Hospers ,
D Piersma ,
R S van Rijn ,
A M Stevense-den Boer ,
G Vreugdenhil ,
M W J M Wouters ,
E Kapiteijn ,
J B Haanen ,
A A M van der Veldt ,
K P M Suijkerbuijk

Abstract

METHODS

Data from advanced melanoma patients rechallenged with IPINIVO after previous ipilimumab-containing treatment were retrieved from the nationwide Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry. Patient characteristics, responses, survival, and safety were analyzed.

CONCLUSIONS

Rechallenge IPINIVO after previous ipilimumab-based therapy had a considerable response rate, acceptable safety profile, and potential for a durable response.

RESULTS

Among 3.759 patients receiving ipilimumab-containing treatment, 73 received rechallenge IPINIVO. 41 received IPINIVO, 32 ipilimumab monotherapy (IPI) as initial therapy. Objective response to rechallenge IPINIVO was seen in 36.1% (initial IPINIVO) and 40.0% (initial IPI) of patients. Median progression-free survival after rechallenge was 2.8 months (initial IPINIVO) and 5.6 months (initial IPI), but reached 18.4 months for responders to rechallenge therapy. Grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events occurred in 40.5% (initial IPINIVO) and 38.7% (initial IPI) of patients. Objective responses to initial and rechallenge treatment were discordant in 48.6% (initial IPINIVO) and 53.3% (initial IPI) of patients. Fifteen patients (20.5%) responded to rechallenge therapy but not to initial treatment.

BACKGROUND

Ipilimumab+nivolumab (IPINIVO) can induce durable responses in advanced melanoma, but many patients experience progression at some point. It is currently unknown to what extent these patients benefit from IPINIVO rechallenge. This study describes efficacy and safety of IPINIVO rechallenge.

More about this publication

British journal of cancer

Volume 133
Issue nr. 1
Pages 66-75
Publication date 01-07-2025

Full text links

Publisher website (DOI) 10.1038/s41416-025-03027-z
Europe PubMed Central 40295727
Pubmed 40295727

Where science meets inspired minds

Contact

Plesmanlaan 121
1066CX Amsterdam

020 512 9111 communicatie@nki.nl

Quick links

  • Vacancies
  • News
  • Contact us
  • Media & Press

Follow us on

Disclaimer
Privacy statement
Cookies
Change cookie settings

This site uses cookies

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.