search

menu

  • Research Research
    • Where science meets inspired minds

    • Back
    • Research
    • Our Science
    • Research Groups
    • Facilities & Platforms
    • Clinical research
    • Find a researcher
    • Publications
    • Knowledge Transfer
  • Careers & study Careers & study
    • Become a leader in cancer research

    • Back
    • Careers & study
    • Vacancies
    • Faculty
    • Scientific staff
    • Scientific support staff
    • Postdoctoral fellows
    • PhD Students
    • Operational staff
    • Clinical fellows
    • Life in Amsterdam
    • Student internships
  • News & Events News & Events
    • Check out our stories and events

    • Back
    • News & Events
    • News
    • Media & Press
    • Calendar
  • About us About us
    • Maximum impact for cancer patients

    • Back
    • About us
    • Our vision
    • Organization
    • Collaborations
    • Responsible Research
    • Support us
    • Visit us
    • Contact us
  • Support us
Support us
  • Home
  • Publications
  • Research
  • Publications
  • Article

Cause-specific mortality after a diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ: Associations with screening and socio-economic status.

Renée S J M Schmitz ,
Alexandra W van den Belt-Dusebout ,
Maartje van Seijen ,
Ellen A J Verschuur ,
Frederieke H van Duijnhoven ,
Michael Schaapveld ,
Esther H Lips ,
Jelle Wesseling ,
Marjanka K Schmidt

Abstract

The lower all-cause mortality in women with Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) compared with the general population has been hypothesized to be due to a "healthy-user effect," but this has not been studied in large cohorts. In a population-based, retrospective cohort study comprising 18,942 women with primary DCIS between 1999 and 2015 in the Netherlands, the cumulative incidence of breast cancer death (BCD) was estimated using death by other cause as a competing risk. The cause-specific mortality risk of women with DCIS was compared with that of the Dutch female population. Multivariable competing risk regression was used to quantify the effects of the method of detection and socio-economic status (SES). With 289 BCDs, the 10-year cumulative incidence of BCD was 1.3% (95% CI, 1.1-1.5). Compared to the Dutch female population, women with DCIS had a 2.1-times higher risk of BCD, but a 7% lower risk of all-cause mortality. Women with screen-detected DCIS had lower risks of BCD compared to women with non-screen-detected DCIS (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR]:0.60, 95% CI 0.47-0.77), as did women with high SES versus low SES (sHR 0.54, 95% CI 0.30-0.97) in the first 4 years of follow-up, adjusted for age and year at diagnosis, and DCIS characteristics. In conclusion, overall mortality in women with DCIS is not higher compared to the Dutch female population, though death due to invasive breast cancer is increased. Within all women with DCIS, those with screen-detected DCIS or high SES had lower BCD and all-cause mortality, suggesting a healthy-user effect.

More about this publication

International journal of cancer

Volume 158
Issue nr. 4
Pages 873-883
Publication date 15-02-2026

Full text links

Publisher website (DOI) 10.1002/ijc.70112
Europe PubMed Central 40853631
Pubmed 40853631

Where science meets inspired minds

Contact

Plesmanlaan 121
1066CX Amsterdam

020 512 9111 communicatie@nki.nl

Quick links

  • Vacancies
  • News
  • Contact us
  • Media & Press

Follow us on

Disclaimer
Privacy statement
Cookies
Change cookie settings

This site uses cookies

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.