search

menu

  • Research Research
    • Where science meets inspired minds

    • Back
    • Research
    • Our Science
    • Research Groups
    • Facilities & Platforms
    • Clinical research
    • Find a researcher
    • Publications
    • Knowledge Transfer
  • Careers & study Careers & study
    • Become a leader in cancer research

    • Back
    • Careers & study
    • Vacancies
    • Faculty
    • Scientific staff
    • Scientific support staff
    • Postdoctoral fellows
    • PhD Students
    • Operational staff
    • Clinical fellows
    • Life in Amsterdam
    • Student internships
  • News & Events News & Events
    • Check out our stories and events

    • Back
    • News & Events
    • News
    • Media & Press
    • Calendar
  • About us About us
    • Maximum impact for cancer patients

    • Back
    • About us
    • Our vision
    • Organization
    • Collaborations
    • Responsible Research
    • Support us
    • Visit us
    • Contact us
  • Support us
Support us
  • Home
  • Publications
  • Research
  • Publications
  • Article

Impact of Reimbursement on the Utilisation of Gene Expression Profiles and Chemotherapy Decision-Making in Dutch Breast Cancer Patients: A Population-Based Study.

Joyce Meijer ,
Nienke Hermanns ,
Rhodé Bijlsma ,
Hedwig M Blommestein ,
Desiree H J G van den Bongard ,
Thijs van Dalen ,
Paul J van Diest ,
Caroline A Drukker ,
Cristina Guerrero Paez ,
Aafke H Honkoop ,
Agnes Jager ,
Linetta B Koppert ,
Sabine C Linn ,
Marissa C van Maaren ,
Ester J Siemerink ,
Laura J van 't ,
José H Volders ,
Marie Jeanne Vrancken Peeters ,
Sabine Siesling

Abstract

This study examined gene expression profile (GEP) use in relation to reimbursement policies and chemotherapy administration, both for patients with and without GEP indication. Women aged ≥ 18-69 years and diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer between January 2011 and June 2024 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. GEP use in relation to reimbursement policies and GEP result in relation to chemotherapy administration was analysed using flowcharts and a trend line. For patients with GEP indication, logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine if the reimbursement periods influenced the GEP use, and GEP use was analysed per region in the Netherlands and incidence year using trend lines. In total, 138,765 patients were included. Among 17,525 patients with GEP indication, proportions of patients who received a GEP were higher during retrospective reimbursement (25%) and publicly known reimbursement (37%) compared with no reimbursement (9%) and differed across regions in the Netherlands. Proportions of patients who did not receive chemotherapy were higher for patients who had a low-risk MammaPrint (93%) or Oncotype DX (97%) result compared with patients who had a high-risk MammaPrint (17%) or Oncotype DX (15%) result. Among 13,003 patients with GEP indication who did not receive GEP, 52% did receive chemotherapy. Approximately one-third of patients who met GEP criteria and were eligible for publicly known reimbursement received a GEP. Appropriate follow-up steps and further research seem required to analyse reasons for not ordering a GEP in times of reimbursement, since GEP results help chemotherapy decision-making.

More about this publication

International journal of cancer

Publication date 04-06-2026

Full text links

Publisher website (DOI) 10.1002/ijc.70571
Europe PubMed Central 42244246
Pubmed 42244246

Where science meets inspired minds

Contact

Plesmanlaan 121
1066CX Amsterdam

020 512 9111 communicatie@nki.nl

Quick links

  • Vacancies
  • News
  • Contact us
  • Media & Press

Follow us on

Disclaimer
Privacy statement
Cookies
Change cookie settings

This site uses cookies

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.