Abstract
METHODS
All breast cancer pathology reports of women < 45 years in the Netherlands (1988-2022) were screened to identify patients diagnosed with PrBC, PPBC (< 12 months postpartum) or AABC (< 12 months after pregnancy interruption). PABC patients were 1:3 matched on age and year of diagnosis to non-PABC breast cancer patients.
CONCLUSIONS
PABC patients diagnosed in advanced pregnancy or shortly postpartum are most at risk for aggressive histopathology and an unfavorable prognosis. This highlights the need for in-depth analyses between specific PABC subgroups to elucidate the etiologic mechanisms involved.
RESULTS
In our PABC cohort (N = 787), the majority was diagnosed during pregnancy (n = 471, 60%). Two distinct prognostic subgroups were observed: a favorable group including trimester 1 PrBC, PPBC 6-12 months postpartum and AABC, and an unfavorable group diagnosed later in pregnancy (trimesters 2 and 3) or shortly postpartum (< 6 months). PABC patients showed overall, in comparison to non-PABC controls, poorer histopathological characteristics (more grade III and triple negative tumors) and a significantly worse 5-year overall survival (77% vs. 85%), persisting in multivariable analysis (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.06 - 2.33, P = 0.025).
PURPOSE
Breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy (PrBC) or postpartum (PPBC) is associated with a poorer prognosis, and earlier research indicated that outcomes differ based on timing of diagnosis. We updated and expanded our Dutch nationwide pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) cohort, now also including patients diagnosed within one year after an interrupted pregnancy (AABC), to compare disease characteristics and prognosis across PrBC-, PPBC- and AABC subgroups and to non-PABC patients.