Support us

Independent patient access to imaging digital health records: Oncology patients' and healthcare professionals' views and preferences.

Abstract

METHODS

A single-centre mixed methods service evaluation (SE) was developed and conducted at a tertiary oncology centre. The service evaluation comprised online questionnaires and semi-structured interviews with oncology patients and three HCP groups involved in cancer care. Qualitative data was analysed using an inductive thematic analysis, with quantitative data analysis consisting of descriptive summary statistics and tests for group differences.

CONCLUSION

Patients and HCP agreed that sharing imaging reports is desirable, however they differed in views regarding timing of release, highlighting the need to balance patient preferences with clinical context.

RESULTS

A total of 131 questionnaires (Patients n = 41; Radiographers n = 35; Radiologists n = 14; Oncology team n = 41) and 32 semi-structured interviews were completed. Patient qualitative analysis highlighted three main themes, i) information access - oncology patients want direct access to their imaging information; ii) autonomy - access to information as per their preferences, preferably prior to clinic appointments and iii) accessibility - imaging reports and information should be clear and understandable. HCP's overall qualitative analysis underlines a support towards independent patient access, however, with concerns raised, particularly among radiologists, about potential misinterpretation leading to increased patient anxiety. Quantitative analysis demonstrated that most patients (98%) favoured independent access to reports and images, with 76% preferring immediate availability. In contrast, 80% of HCP recommended access only after clinical discussion. Lay summary report formats were viewed positively by 85% of patients and 63% of HCP.

INTRODUCTION

To explore the perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals (HCP) in a specialist oncology centre regarding independent patient access to imaging results through Digital Health Records (DHR).

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

As DHR adoption expands alongside independent patient access, these insights can inform the design of accessible, safe, and patient-centred imaging data sharing in oncology.

More about this publication

Radiography (London, England : 1995)
  • Volume 32
  • Issue nr. 5
  • Pages 103451
  • Publication date 27-05-2026

This site uses cookies

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.