search

menu

  • Research Research
    • Where science meets inspired minds

    • Back
    • Research
    • Our Science
    • Research Groups
    • Facilities & Platforms
    • Clinical research
    • Find a researcher
    • Publications
    • Knowledge Transfer
  • Careers & study Careers & study
    • Become a leader in cancer research

    • Back
    • Careers & study
    • Vacancies
    • Faculty
    • Scientific staff
    • Scientific support staff
    • Postdoctoral fellows
    • PhD Students
    • Operational staff
    • Clinical fellows
    • Life in Amsterdam
    • Student internships
  • News & Events News & Events
    • Check out our stories and events

    • Back
    • News & Events
    • News
    • Media & Press
    • Calendar
  • About us About us
    • Maximum impact for cancer patients

    • Back
    • About us
    • Our vision
    • Organization
    • Collaborations
    • Responsible Research
    • Support us
    • Visit us
    • Contact us
  • Support us
Support us
  • Home
  • Publications
  • Research
  • Publications
  • Article

Clarifying risk-factor associations with quantitative breast tumor features: a pooled analysis of 24 studies.

Daniel Adams ,
Amber N Hurson ,
Thomas U Ahearn ,
Irene L Andrulis ,
Antonis C Antoniou ,
Päivi Auvinen ,
Anita Bane ,
Sabine Behrens ,
Amy Berrington de Gonzalez ,
Katarzyna Białkowska ,
Clara Bodelon ,
Manjeet K Bolla ,
Maria Borrero ,
Hermann Brenner ,
Ian W Brock ,
Annegien Broeks ,
Nicola J Camp ,
Melissa H Cessna ,
Stephen J Chanock ,
Georgia Chenevix-Trench ,
Ellen Copson ,
Fergus J Couch ,
Angela Cox ,
Simon S Cross ,
Peter Devilee ,
Alison M Dunning ,
Douglas F Easton ,
Diana M Eccles ,
Jonine D Figueroa ,
Gord Glendon ,
Anna González-Neira ,
Ute Hamann ,
Jaana M Hartikainen ,
Mikael Hartman ,
Bernadette A M Heemskerk-Gerritsen ,
Peh Joo Ho ,
James M Hodge ,
Bernd Holleczek ,
Antoinette Hollestelle ,
Maartje J Hooning ,
,
,
Anna Jakubowska ,
Michael E Jones ,
Louise Jones ,
Brandt Jones ,
Audrey Jung ,
Rudolf Kaaks ,
Renske Keeman ,
Scott Lawrence ,
Jingmei Li ,
Jolanta Lissowska ,
Jan Lubiński ,
Arto Mannermaa ,
Mehdi Manoochehri ,
John W M Martens ,
Wilma E Mesker ,
Noor Muhammad ,
Anna Marie Mulligan ,
Nadia Obi ,
Janet E Olson ,
Ana Osorio ,
Penelope D Ottewell ,
Alpa V Patel ,
Guillermo Pita ,
Karolina Prajzendanc ,
Muhammad U Rashid ,
Kathryn J Ruddy ,
Fatemeh Safizadeh ,
Ben Schöttker ,
Petra Seibold ,
William J Tapper ,
Maria Tengström ,
Lauren R Teras ,
Heather Thorne ,
Mieke A M Timmermans ,
Rob A E M Tollenaar ,
Celine M Vachon ,
Qin Wang ,
Jelle Wesseling ,
Siddhartha Yadav ,
Xiaohong R Yang ,
M Pilar Zamora ,
Jenny Chang-Claude ,
Marjanka K Schmidt ,
Paul D P Pharoah ,
Mustapha Abubakar ,
Montserrat García-Closas

Abstract

METHODS

Analyses of 15,731 invasive breast cancers from 24 studies evaluated associations (p-trend) between reproductive and hormonal factors, body mass index (BMI), alcohol, smoking, and family history in relation to quantitative immunohistochemistry measures on tissue microarrays (ER, PR, HER2, KI67, TP53) and tumor grade. Analyses in a subset of 10 population-based studies estimated subtype-specific odds ratios (ORs) comparing cases to controls. A Bayesian False Discovery Probability (BFDP) <0.2 was used to identify associations with strong statistical evidence.

CONCLUSION

This pooled analysis of 15,731 cases showed that nulliparity, age at menopause, MHT, and BMI have independent, dose-response associations with ER, PR, and grade, clarifying patterns of etiologic heterogeneity. Associations with HER2, KI67 and TP53, or other risk factors did not meet our threshold for strong evidence.

RESULTS

Nulliparity and later age at menopause were associated with higher ER-positivity (p-trend=0.021 and 0.001, respectively), with corresponding OR[ER+] (95% CI) = 1.49 (1.16-1.90) for nulliparous vs. parous and 1.07 (1.03-1.11) per 5 years. Current combined menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) use was associated with lower grade (p-trend<0.001), with OR [grade1] = 3.37 (2.69-4.21) for current vs. never users. Higher BMI was associated with lower ER-positivity and higher grade in premenopausal women (p-trend<0.001 and <0.001), with OR[ER+] = 0.80 (0.74-0.87) and OR[grade1] = 0.75 (0.63-0.88) per 5 units, and with higher PR-positivity and higher grade in postmenopausal women (p-trend<0.001 and <0.001), with OR[PR+] = 1.08 (1.03-1.14) and OR[grade 3] = 1.10 (1.04-1.17) per 5 units.

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is etiologically heterogeneous, but which risk factors differ in their associations across tumor subtypes remains unclear. We conducted a large, pooled analysis to evaluate independent, dose-response associations between breast cancer risk factors and quantitative tumor features.

More about this publication

Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Publication date 24-07-2026

Full text links

Publisher website (DOI) 10.1093/jnci/djag244
Europe PubMed Central 42498670
Pubmed 42498670

Where science meets inspired minds

Contact

Plesmanlaan 121
1066CX Amsterdam

020 512 9111 communicatie@nki.nl

Quick links

  • Vacancies
  • News
  • Contact us
  • Media & Press

Follow us on

Disclaimer
Privacy statement
Cookies
Change cookie settings

This site uses cookies

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.