search

menu

  • Research Research
    • Where science meets inspired minds

    • Back
    • Research
    • Our Science
    • Research Groups
    • Facilities & Platforms
    • Clinical research
    • Find a researcher
    • Publications
    • Knowledge Transfer
  • Careers & study Careers & study
    • Become a leader in cancer research

    • Back
    • Careers & study
    • Vacancies
    • Faculty
    • Scientific staff
    • Scientific support staff
    • Postdoctoral fellows
    • PhD Students
    • Operational staff
    • Clinical fellows
    • Life in Amsterdam
    • Student internships
  • News & Events News & Events
    • Check out our stories and events

    • Back
    • News & Events
    • News
    • Media & Press
    • Calendar
  • About us About us
    • Maximum impact for cancer patients

    • Back
    • About us
    • Our vision
    • Organization
    • Collaborations
    • Responsible Research
    • Support us
    • Visit us
    • Contact us
  • Support us
Support us
  • Home
  • Publications
  • Research
  • Publications
  • Article

One size does not fit all: data-driven insights of patient-reported outcomes to tailor supportive care in breast cancer.

Eva Boomstra ,
Kelly M de Ligt ,
Renaud Tissier ,
Felix Clouth ,
Sabine Linn ,
Floortje Mols ,
Iris M C van der Ploeg ,
Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse

Abstract

PURPOSE: Supportive care resources are limited, requiring a strategic, tailored approach, especially with the growing population of breast cancer patients. We examined whether routinely collected patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can identify meaningful health-related quality of life (HRQoL) trajectories and help guide resource allocation of supportive care. METHODS: As part of routine care at the Netherlands Cancer Institute, 2181 early-stage breast cancer patients completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23 before treatment and six months later. Through Latent Class and Latent Transition Analyses, we identified HRQoL subgroups and transitions between subgroups over time. Multinomial regression examined sociodemographic and clinical correlates. Network analysis detected key domains and inter-domain connections within subgroups. RESULTS: Three HRQoL subgroups were identified at baseline: Excellent HRQoL (53%), Good HRQoL with Psychosocial concerns (33%), and Poor HRQoL with severe functional limitations (13%). Multiple comorbidities and history of depression were independently and strongly associated with membership to less favorable subgroups. Subgroup transitions were rare (1–5%). Network analysis showed subgroup-specific key domains: emotional functioning in the Psychosocial concerns-subgroup, and menopausal symptoms, social, and role functioning in the Poor HRQoL-subgroup; the latter subgroup showing the highest interconnectivity between HRQoL-domains. CONCLUSION: Baseline HRQoL and sociodemographic factors, independent of treatment, is associated with HRQoL trajectories and can guide efficient re-allocation of resources to those patients with complex needs. Most patients maintain excellent HRQoL and may benefit from low-intensity or self-management support, whereas targeted, multidisciplinary interventions should be prioritized for those with complex needs. Different key domains and connectivity suggest different types of supportive care are needed for different subgroups.

More about this publication

Breast cancer research : BCR

Volume 28
Issue nr. 1
Publication date 30-01-2026

Full text links

Publisher website (DOI) 10.1186/s13058-026-02228-5
Europe PubMed Central 41612468
Pubmed 41612468

Where science meets inspired minds

Contact

Plesmanlaan 121
1066CX Amsterdam

020 512 9111 communicatie@nki.nl

Quick links

  • Vacancies
  • News
  • Contact us
  • Media & Press

Follow us on

Disclaimer
Privacy statement
Cookies
Change cookie settings

This site uses cookies

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.