search

menu

  • Research Research
    • Where science meets inspired minds

    • Back
    • Research
    • Our Science
    • Research Groups
    • Facilities & Platforms
    • Clinical research
    • Find a researcher
    • Publications
    • Knowledge Transfer
  • Careers & study Careers & study
    • Become a leader in cancer research

    • Back
    • Careers & study
    • Vacancies
    • Faculty
    • Scientific staff
    • Scientific support staff
    • Postdoctoral fellows
    • PhD Students
    • Operational staff
    • Clinical fellows
    • Life in Amsterdam
    • Student internships
  • News & Events News & Events
    • Check out our stories and events

    • Back
    • News & Events
    • News
    • Media & Press
    • Calendar
  • About us About us
    • Maximum impact for cancer patients

    • Back
    • About us
    • Our vision
    • Organization
    • Collaborations
    • Responsible Research
    • Support us
    • Visit us
    • Contact us
  • Support us
Support us
  • Home
  • Publications
  • Research
  • Publications
  • Article

Development and clinical evaluation of a second-generation voice prosthesis (Provox 2), designed for anterograde and retrograde insertion.

F J Hilgers ,
A H Ackerstaff ,
A J Balm ,
I B Tan ,
N K Aaronson ,
J O Persson

Abstract

Prosthetic voice restoration has considerably improved the results of vocal rehabilitation after total laryngectomy, and is presently the method of choice for many health-care providers treating laryngectomized patients. The Provox voice prosthesis, developed in the Netherlands Cancer Institute, is an indwelling device that has been applied in recent years with regular success. Its retrograde replacement method, using a disposable guide wire, assures reliable, atraumatic positioning of the prosthesis in the tracheoesophageal fistula. However, the method sometimes may be uncomfortable for the patient; therefore an adapted prosthesis and new replacement equipment were developed, which enable bidirectional insertion, i.e. not only in the traditional retrograde manner through the pharynx, but especially in an anterograde manner through the stoma. This second-generation voice prosthesis (Provox 2) was studied in a prospective clinical trial in 44 patients (33 experienced patients, seven first-time replacements and four primary insertions). The study demonstrated that the anterograde insertion with the Provox 2 system was applicable in all patients, making the voice prosthesis even easier to handle than with the traditional retrograde method. A stenosis of the pharyngoesophageal segment no longer interfered with the replacement. In addition, the patients judged the new method as being favourable, reporting significantly less discomfort during the replacement procedure (paired Student's t-test: p < 0.0001). Furthermore, the adapted voice prosthesis could be removed from the tracheoesophageal fistula without excessive force (mean 7.9 N, range 6.0-14.0 N), more easily than the original Provox (mean 20.9 N, range 5.5-25.0 N). It can be concluded that this second-generation indwelling voice prosthesis (Provox 2) seems to be a further improvement in the application of this voice rehabilitation system, not only simplifying the replacement procedure, but also diminishing the discomfort for the patient.

More about this publication

Acta oto-laryngologica

Volume 117
Issue nr. 6
Pages 889-96
Publication date 01-11-1997

Full text links

Publisher website (DOI) 10.3109/00016489709114220
Europe PubMed Central 9442833
Pubmed 9442833

Where science meets inspired minds

Contact

Plesmanlaan 121
1066CX Amsterdam

020 512 9111 communicatie@nki.nl

Quick links

  • Vacancies
  • News
  • Contact us
  • Media & Press

Follow us on

Disclaimer
Privacy statement
Cookies
Change cookie settings

This site uses cookies

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.