search

menu

  • Research Research
    • Where science meets inspired minds

    • Back
    • Research
    • Our Science
    • Research Groups
    • Facilities & Platforms
    • Clinical research
    • Find a researcher
    • Publications
    • Knowledge Transfer
  • Careers & study Careers & study
    • Become a leader in cancer research

    • Back
    • Careers & study
    • Vacancies
    • Faculty
    • Scientific staff
    • Scientific support staff
    • Postdoctoral fellows
    • PhD Students
    • Operational staff
    • Clinical fellows
    • Life in Amsterdam
    • Student internships
  • News & Events News & Events
    • Check out our stories and events

    • Back
    • News & Events
    • News
    • Media & Press
    • Calendar
  • About us About us
    • Maximum impact for cancer patients

    • Back
    • About us
    • Our vision
    • Organization
    • Collaborations
    • Responsible Research
    • Support us
    • Visit us
    • Contact us
  • Support us
Support us
  • Home
  • Publications
  • Research
  • Publications
  • Article

Estimation of accumulated dose to organs at risk in head and neck cancer patients treated with scheduled replanning and dose painting in the ARTFORCE trial.

Anna Liza M P de Leeuw ,
Simon R van Kranen ,
Jordi Giralt ,
Yungan Tao ,
Sergi Benavente ,
Thanh-Vân F Nguyen ,
Frank J P Hoebers ,
Ann Hoeben ,
Chris H J Terhaard ,
Lip Wai Lee ,
Signe Friesland ,
Roel J H M Steenbakkers ,
Harry Bartelink ,
Coen R N Rasch ,
Jan-Jakob Sonke ,
Olga Hamming-Vrieze

Abstract

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Delivered doses were estimated for 81 patients who were prospectively treated with DP + ART using deformable image registration between CBCT and the planning CT's. Three simulations were conducted, evaluating (1) a scenario without replanning (SimnoART), (2) a scenario with ART at fraction 12 (SimART), and (3) the clinical practice with ad hoc replanning (Simdelivered). It was further evaluated whether selecting patients for ART using accumulated dose in the first 10 fractions (Df10) to the parotid glands and larynx would improve ART efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Although relevant dose differences between planned and delivered doses were seen in almost half of the patients without ART, minimal improvements in delivered doses were seen introducing ART. Nonetheless, Df10 was prognostic for relevant changes upon completing treatment and selecting patients for ART significantly improved larynx dose. Incorporating accumulated dose into patient selection for ART could help avoid unforeseen increases in delivered dose.

RESULTS

In SimnoART, 41% of patients had delivered dose deviations ≥ 3 Gy compared to the planned dose in any OAR, primarily in the parotid glands and larynx. No significant differences were seen between SimnoART, SimART and Simdelivered (P ≥ 0.10). Df10 predicted relevant changes upon completing treatment with AUC ≥ 0.95. By selecting patients for ART using Df10, delivered dose significantly improved for the larynx (P ≤ 0.01).

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This study investigated whether scheduled adaptive radiotherapy (ART) improved delivered dose to organs at risk (OAR) in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer treated with dose painting (DP).

More about this publication

Physics and imaging in radiation oncology

Volume 39
Pages 100957
Publication date 01-05-2026

Full text links

Publisher website (DOI) 10.1016/j.phro.2026.100957
Europe PubMed Central 42125647
Pubmed 42125647

Where science meets inspired minds

Contact

Plesmanlaan 121
1066CX Amsterdam

020 512 9111 communicatie@nki.nl

Quick links

  • Vacancies
  • News
  • Contact us
  • Media & Press

Follow us on

Disclaimer
Privacy statement
Cookies
Change cookie settings

This site uses cookies

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.