Abstract
METHODS
The study included 522 head and neck cancer patients, undergoing 638 primary and salvage (selective) neck dissections between 2002 and 2012. Before 2007 the neck dissection specimens were macroscopically and microscopically examined by pathologists and after 2007 the macroscopic examination was performed by pathology technicians. For comparison of mean LN yields, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.
CONCLUSIONS
A significant increase in the number of harvested LNs, but a decrease in LNR was observed after introducing pathology technicians for macroscopic examination. A clear association between the extent of the dissection and the number of harvested LNs was observed. LNR appears to be strongly dependent on the harvesting protocol and the extent of the dissection.
RESULTS
The mean number of LNs among 374 specimens examined by pathologists was 24 (range 0-89) vs. 32 (range 2-89) among 264 specimens examined by pathology technicians (P<.001). This caused the mean LNR in the non pre-treated patient group to drop from 11.4% to 8.7%. The counts of LNs per type of neck dissection were significantly different and increased with the number of levels involved. However, there was no linear relationship and the higher yields could be mostly ascribed to LNs in level V. The LNR varied from 8.1% to 18.4% among the different types of neck dissections.
OBJECTIVES
Recent studies suggest that lymph node ratio (LNR) is a strong prognostic factor in head and neck cancer. This study aims to determine if the yield of harvested lymph nodes (LNs) influences the LNR.