search

menu

  • Research Research
    • Where science meets inspired minds

    • Back
    • Research
    • Our Science
    • Research Groups
    • Facilities & Platforms
    • Clinical research
    • Find a researcher
    • Publications
    • Knowledge Transfer
  • Careers & study Careers & study
    • Become a leader in cancer research

    • Back
    • Careers & study
    • Vacancies
    • Faculty
    • Scientific staff
    • Scientific support staff
    • Postdoctoral fellows
    • PhD Students
    • Operational staff
    • Clinical fellows
    • Life in Amsterdam
    • Student internships
  • News & Events News & Events
    • Check out our stories and events

    • Back
    • News & Events
    • News
    • Media & Press
    • Calendar
  • About us About us
    • Maximum impact for cancer patients

    • Back
    • About us
    • Our vision
    • Organization
    • Collaborations
    • Responsible Research
    • Support us
    • Visit us
    • Contact us
  • Support us
Support us
  • Home
  • Publications
  • Research
  • Publications
  • Article

Head-to-head comparison of the hybrid tracer indocyanine green-99mTc-nanocolloid with 99mTc-Senti-Scint using sentinel node lymphoscintigraphy and single-photon emission computed tomography combined with computer tomography in melanoma.

Daphne D D Rietbergen ,
Philippa Meershoek ,
Gijs H KleinJan ,
Maarten Donswijk ,
Renato A Valdés Olmos ,
Fijs W B van Leeuwen ,
Martin W M C Klop ,
Jos A van der Hage

Abstract

METHODS

Twenty-five patients (mean age: 56.9 years, range: 25-79 years) with a melanoma scheduled for SLN biopsy prior to (re)excision of the primary lesion (scar) were prospectively included following a two-day procedure. The first day, after Tc-Senti-Scint injection in four intradermal depots around the primary lesion or scar, early/delayed lymphoscintigraphy and SPECT-CT images were acquired. The injection sites were marked. The second day, after assessing lymph node radioactivity using planar scintigraphy, ICG-Tc-nanocolloid was injected at the previously marked skin points and imaging was performed. The paired planar and SPECT-CT images of both tracers were evaluated with respect to drainage patterns, SLN visualization and non-SLN appearing.

CONCLUSION

A slightly higher SLN visualization accompanied by a tendency to depict more non-SLNs was found for ICG-Tc-nanocolloid. Excepting the head and neck area, an overall high concordance in drainage was found for both radiotracers. With an additional value for the hybrid tracer due to the combination of preoperative imaging and the additional visual signal in the operation room, added by the fluorescent component of the hybrid tracer, there was a preference for ICG-Tc-nanocolloid.

RESULTS

Twenty-four out of 25 patients were evaluable. SLN visualization on a patient basis was 100% for ICG-Tc-nanocolloid and 96% for Tc-Senti-Scint, whereas uptake in non-SLNs was found in, respectively, 71% (17/24) and 61% (14/23). Concordance in drainage to 45 lymph node basins was 91%. Discordant drainage was found for two melanomas in the head-and-neck and one in the clavicular area. Unique lymph node basins were seen in 44/45 (98%) for ICG-Tc-nanocolloid and 42/45 (93%) for Tc-Senti-Scint. Concerning identified SLNs, the number was similar for both tracers (n = 58); however, more non-SLNs (65 vs 50) were visualized with ICG-Tc-nanocolloid than with Tc-Senti-Scint.

OBJECTIVE

The hybrid tracer indocyanine green (ICG)-Tc-nanocolloid has been introduced for sentinel node imaging. However, until now, a comparison of this tracer with other radiocolloids with a larger particle size has not been effectuated. Based on a head-to-head evaluation in patients with melanoma, we have compared ICG-Tc-nanocolloid (particle size 5-80 nm) with Tc-Senti-Scint (particle size 100-600 nm) to establish differences in drainage pattern and sentinel node localization using lymphoscintigraphy and single-photon emission computed tomography combined with computer tomography (SPECT-CT) in melanoma patients scheduled for sentinel node biopsy.

More about this publication

Nuclear medicine communications

Volume 41
Issue nr. 10
Pages 1010-1017
Publication date 01-10-2020

Full text links

Publisher website (DOI) 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001256
Europe PubMed Central 32925825
Pubmed 32925825

Where science meets inspired minds

Contact

Plesmanlaan 121
1066CX Amsterdam

020 512 9111 communicatie@nki.nl

Quick links

  • Vacancies
  • News
  • Contact us
  • Media & Press

Follow us on

Disclaimer
Privacy statement
Cookies
Change cookie settings

This site uses cookies

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.