search

menu

  • Research Research
    • Where science meets inspired minds

    • Back
    • Research
    • Our Science
    • Research Groups
    • Facilities & Platforms
    • Clinical research
    • Find a researcher
    • Publications
    • Knowledge Transfer
  • Careers & study Careers & study
    • Become a leader in cancer research

    • Back
    • Careers & study
    • Vacancies
    • Faculty
    • Scientific staff
    • Scientific support staff
    • Postdoctoral fellows
    • PhD Students
    • Operational staff
    • Clinical fellows
    • Life in Amsterdam
    • Student internships
  • News & Events News & Events
    • Check out our stories and events

    • Back
    • News & Events
    • News
    • Media & Press
    • Calendar
  • About us About us
    • Maximum impact for cancer patients

    • Back
    • About us
    • Our vision
    • Organization
    • Collaborations
    • Responsible Research
    • Support us
    • Visit us
    • Contact us
  • Support us
Support us
  • Home
  • Publications
  • Research
  • Publications
  • Article

Structural basis of reversine selectivity in inhibiting Mps1 more potently than aurora B kinase.

Yoshitaka Hiruma ,
Andre Koch ,
Shreya Dharadhar ,
Robbie P Joosten ,
Anastassis Perrakis

Abstract

Monopolar spindle 1 (Mps1, also known as TTK) is a protein kinase crucial for ensuring that cell division progresses to anaphase only after all chromosomes are connected to spindle microtubules. Incomplete chromosomal attachment leads to abnormal chromosome counts in the daughter cells (aneuploidy), a condition common in many solid cancers. Therefore Mps1 is an established target in cancer therapy. Mps1 kinase inhibitors include reversine (2-(4-morpholinoanilino)-6-cyclohexylaminopurine), a promiscuous compound first recognized as an inhibitor of the Aurora B mitotic kinase. Here, we present the 3.0-Å resolution crystal structure of the Mps1 kinase domain bound to reversine. Structural comparison of reversine bound to Mps1 and Aurora B, indicates a similar binding pose for the purine moiety of reversine making three conserved hydrogen bonds to the protein main chain, explaining the observed promiscuity of this inhibitor. The cyclohexyl and morpholinoaniline moieties of reversine however, have more extensive contacts with the protein in Mps1 than in Aurora B. This is reflected both in structure-based docking energy calculations, and in new experimental data we present here, that both confirm that the affinity of reversine towards Mps1 is about two orders of magnitude higher than towards Aurora B. Thus, our data provides detailed structural understanding of the existing literature that argues reversine inhibits Mps1 more efficiently than Aurora B based on biochemical and in-cell assays. Proteins 2016; 84:1761-1766. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

More about this publication

Proteins

Volume 84
Issue nr. 12
Pages 1761-1766
Publication date 01-12-2016

Full text links

Publisher website (DOI) 10.1002/prot.25174
Europe PubMed Central 27699881
Pubmed 27699881

Where science meets inspired minds

Contact

Plesmanlaan 121
1066CX Amsterdam

020 512 9111 communicatie@nki.nl

Quick links

  • Vacancies
  • News
  • Contact us
  • Media & Press

Follow us on

Disclaimer
Privacy statement
Cookies
Change cookie settings

This site uses cookies

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.