search

menu

  • Research Research
    • Where science meets inspired minds

    • Back
    • Research
    • Our Science
    • Research Groups
    • Facilities & Platforms
    • Clinical research
    • Find a researcher
    • Publications
    • Knowledge Transfer
  • Careers & study Careers & study
    • Become a leader in cancer research

    • Back
    • Careers & study
    • Vacancies
    • Faculty
    • Scientific staff
    • Scientific support staff
    • Postdoctoral fellows
    • PhD Students
    • Operational staff
    • Clinical fellows
    • Life in Amsterdam
    • Student internships
  • News & Events News & Events
    • Check out our stories and events

    • Back
    • News & Events
    • News
    • Media & Press
    • Calendar
  • About us About us
    • Maximum impact for cancer patients

    • Back
    • About us
    • Our vision
    • Organization
    • Collaborations
    • Responsible Research
    • Support us
    • Visit us
    • Contact us
  • Support us
Support us
  • Home
  • Publications
  • Research
  • Publications
  • Article

RECIST progression: Patterns among target, non-target, non-measurable and new lesions progression.

Teresa M Tareco Bucho ,
Luca Pascucci ,
Giovanni Mancò ,
Alessio Taraschi ,
Maria Claudia Macchia ,
Nicola Tinari ,
Davide Brocco ,
Regina G H Beets-Tan ,
Andrea Delli Pizzi ,
Stefano Trebeschi

Abstract

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We collected retrospective data from N = 223 patients (mean age 67 ± 16 years; 151 men) undergoing immunotherapy per standard-of-care, whose treatment decisions did not follow RECIST. Imaging data were gathered for up to two years post-baseline, continuously evaluating RECIST-defined progression types. We analyzed co-occurrence patterns using odds ratios of progression events and assessed prognostic impacts with time-varying Cox regression models.

CONCLUSION

RECIST-defined progression types often co-occur, suggesting they represent variations of a shared treatment failure process rather than independent events. Future developments should focus on quantitative metrics for progression.

RESULTS

Of 223 patients, 115 (52%) experienced at least one type of progression. Most patients (57%) experienced multiple types of progression. Most patients with only one type of progression did not have follow-up scans to determine if other types of progression would have occurred later. In general, all progression types are likely to co-occur, supported by significant positive odds ratios. New lesions were more frequent early in treatment, while other types showed no clear temporal trends. Non-measurable progression had the strongest association with worse survival (HR, 2.33; CI: 1.45-3.74; p < 0.001), followed by new lesions (HR, 1.73; CI: 1.05-2.86; p = 0.03) and target lesion progression (HR, 1.66; CI: 1.07-2.58; p = 0.02). Non-target lesion progression was rare (9%) and not prognostic.

OBJECTIVES

This study investigates whether different types of RECIST-defined tumor progression reflect distinct biological processes or variations of the same progression.

More about this publication

European journal of radiology

Volume 186
Pages 112038
Publication date 01-05-2025

Full text links

Publisher website (DOI) 10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112038
Europe PubMed Central 40096772
Pubmed 40096772

Where science meets inspired minds

Contact

Plesmanlaan 121
1066CX Amsterdam

020 512 9111 communicatie@nki.nl

Quick links

  • Vacancies
  • News
  • Contact us
  • Media & Press

Follow us on

Disclaimer
Privacy statement
Cookies
Change cookie settings

This site uses cookies

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.