search

menu

  • Research Research
    • Where science meets inspired minds

    • Back
    • Research
    • Our Science
    • Research Groups
    • Facilities & Platforms
    • Clinical research
    • Find a researcher
    • Publications
    • Knowledge Transfer
  • Careers & study Careers & study
    • Become a leader in cancer research

    • Back
    • Careers & study
    • Vacancies
    • Faculty
    • Scientific staff
    • Scientific support staff
    • Postdoctoral fellows
    • PhD Students
    • Operational staff
    • Clinical fellows
    • Life in Amsterdam
    • Student internships
  • News & Events News & Events
    • Check out our stories and events

    • Back
    • News & Events
    • News
    • Media & Press
    • Calendar
  • About us About us
    • Maximum impact for cancer patients

    • Back
    • About us
    • Our vision
    • Organization
    • Collaborations
    • Responsible Research
    • Support us
    • Visit us
    • Contact us
  • Support us
Support us
  • Home
  • Publications
  • Research
  • Publications
  • Article

Experiences of metastatic prostate cancer patients with a mainstream genetic testing pathway.

Michiel Vlaming ,
Eveline M A Bleiker ,
Gina Schijven ,
Lambertus A L M Kiemeney ,
Harm H E van Melick ,
Jarmo C B Hunting ,
M Arjen Noordzij ,
Aart Beeker ,
Diederik M Somford ,
Henk G van der Poel ,
Carl J Wijburg ,
Bart P Wijsman ,
Robert J Hoekstra ,
R Jeroen A van Moorselaar ,
Bart P J van Bezooijen ,
Richard P Meijer ,
Martijn B Busstra ,
H Pieter van den Berg ,
Debbie G J Robbrecht ,
Benjamin H J Doornweerd ,
Inge M van Oort ,
Margreet G E M Ausems

Abstract

Patients with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) are eligible for germline genetic testing. This study assessed the experiences of mPCa patients undergoing genetic testing after being counselled by non-genetic healthcare professionals (ngHCPs: urologists, oncologists, nurses). We assessed the psychosocial impact, decision-making difficulties and knowledge of genetics. In a prospective cohort study across 15 hospitals in the Netherlands, genetic testing was discussed and requested by ngHCPs. Patients completed questionnaires shortly after receiving pre-test genetic counselling and 4 weeks and 6 months after receiving their genetic test results. Anxiety, depression, distress, decisional conflict regarding genetic testing, decision regret and knowledge of genetics were assessed. Of 767 patients who received germline genetic testing, 5% to 8% experienced clinically significant anxiety or depression at some point in time. Although up to 49% of participants had significantly elevated distress scores as assessed with the Distress Thermometer, more than 90% stated that the testing process did not affect their feelings of distress. Patients with high educational levels had more favourable outcomes than patients with low educational levels on distress and decisional conflict (odds ratios 0.36 [0.23-0.57] and 0.44 [0.21-0.93], respectively). Furthermore, only 50% of the knowledge questions about genetics were answered correctly. To conclude, germline genetic testing within a mainstreaming pathway does not lead to increased levels of general anxiety or depression in most mPCa patients. However, the poorer outcomes on several psychosocial measures for patients with low educational levels are a point of concern.

More about this publication

International journal of cancer

Volume 158
Issue nr. 4
Pages 984-993
Publication date 15-02-2026

Full text links

Publisher website (DOI) 10.1002/ijc.70194
Europe PubMed Central 41078342
Pubmed 41078342

Where science meets inspired minds

Contact

Plesmanlaan 121
1066CX Amsterdam

020 512 9111 communicatie@nki.nl

Quick links

  • Vacancies
  • News
  • Contact us
  • Media & Press

Follow us on

Disclaimer
Privacy statement
Cookies
Change cookie settings

This site uses cookies

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.