The cycle effect quantified: reduced tumour uptake in subsequent cycles of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE during peptide receptor radionuclide therapy.

Abstract

RESULTS

The final PK model adequately captured observed radioactivity accumulation in kidney, spleen and tumour. A higher tumour volume was identified to increase the tumour uptake rate, where a twofold increase in tumour volume resulted in a 2.3-fold higher uptake rate. Also, continued use of long-acting SSAs significantly reduced the spleen uptake rate (68.4% uptake compared to SSA withdrawal (10.5% RSE)). Lastly, a cycle effect was significantly identified, where tumour uptake rate decreased to 86.9% (5.3% RSE) in the second cycle and even further to 79.7% (5.6% RSE) and 77.6% (6.2% RSE) in the third and fourth cycle, respectively, compared to cycle one.

METHODS

A population PK model was developed using imaging data from 48 patients who received multiple cycles of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE. The five-compartment model included a central, kidney, spleen, tumour and lumped rest compartment. Tumour volume and continued use of long-acting somatostatin analogues (SSAs) were tested as covariates in the model. In addition, the presence of a cycle effect was evaluated by relating the uptake rate in a specific cycle as a fraction of the (tumour or organ) uptake rate in the first cycle.

BACKGROUND

Clear evidence regarding the effect of reduced tumour accumulation in later peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) cycles is lacking. Therefore, we aimed to quantify potential cycle effects for patients treated with [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE using a population pharmacokinetic (PK) modelling approach.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a population PK modelling approach, the cycle effect of reduced tumour uptake in subsequent PRRT cycles was quantified. Our findings implied that downregulation of target receptors is probably not the major cause of the cycle effect, due to a plateau in the decrease of tumour uptake in the fourth cycle.

More about this publication

European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
  • Volume 51
  • Issue nr. 3
  • Pages 820-827
  • Publication date 01-02-2024

This site uses cookies

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.