Utility of diagnostic breast excision biopsies during two decades of screening mammography.

Abstract

METHODS

All women with an excision biopsy among 817,656 screens, obtained from January 1997 to January 2017, were included.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the use of excision biopsy significantly decreased over the past two decades, we observed a significant increased rate in more recent years. Since the vast majority of currently performed excision biopsies reveals a benign diagnosis or shows low grade DCIS, a secondary excision biopsy should only be considered if radiologic surveillance and repeated percutaneous biopsy continues to yield indeterminate results.

RESULTS

Of 18,593 recalled women (recall rate, 2.3%) with screen-detected abnormalities, 908 (4.9%) underwent excision biopsy. Of these, 411 (45.3%) were performed as first diagnostic intervention, decreasing from 4.3 per 1000 screens in 1997-1998 to 0 per 1000 screens in 2015-2016. The remaining 497 (54.7%) excision biopsies were performed secondary to pathologic findings at percutaneous biopsy. During 1997-1998, 1.0 secondary biopsies per 1000 screens were performed, decreasing to 0.3 per 1000 in 2005-2006 and afterwards increased to 0.6 per 1000 in 2015-2016 (p = 0.003). Of all 487 secondary biopsies, 303 (61.0%) had a benign pathology outcome, increasing from 40.4% in 1997-1998 to 70.2% in 2015-2016. Of all 211 biopsies in the three most recent cohorts (2011-2016) the overall upgrade rate was 26.5%, consisting of 39 (18.5%) DCIS (27 low grade) and 17 (8.1%) invasive carcinomas.

INTRODUCTION

We evaluated the use and value of breast surgical excision biopsies for diagnostic purposes over the last decades in women undergoing mammographic screening, either as a primary procedure or following an inconclusive percutaneous biopsy.

More about this publication

Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland)
  • Volume 46
  • Pages 157-162
  • Publication date 01-08-2019

This site uses cookies

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.