Supine Breast MRI Using Respiratory Triggering.

Abstract

CONCLUSIONS

Acquisition of high-quality supine breast MRI is possible when respiratory triggering is applied, in a similar setup as during subsequent treatment. Image quality improved when compared to supine non-triggered breast MRI and prone breast MRI, but at the cost of increased acquisition time.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate if navigator-echo respiratory-triggered magnetic resonance acquisition can acquire supine high-quality breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Supine respiratory-triggered magnetic resonance imaging (Trig-MRI) was compared to supine non-Trig-MRI to evaluate breathing-induced motion artifacts (group 1), and to conventional prone non-Trig-MRI (group 2, 16-channel breast coil), all at 3T. A 32-channel thorax coil was placed on top of a cover to prevent breast deformation. Ten volunteers were scanned in each group, including one patient. The acquisition time was recorded. Image quality was compared by visual examination and by calculation of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and image sharpness (IS).

RESULTS

Scan time increased from 56.5 seconds (non-Trig-MRI) to an average of 306 seconds with supine Trig-MRI (range: 120-540 seconds). In group 1, the median values (interquartile range) of SNR, CNR, and IS improved from 11.5 (6.0), 7.3 (3.1), and 0.23 (0.2) cm on supine non-Trig-MRI to 38.1 (29.1), 32.8 (29.7), and 0.12 (0) cm (all P < 0.01) on supine Trig-MRI. All qualitative image parameters in group 1 improved on supine Trig-MRI (all P < 0.01). In group 2, SNR and CNR improved from 14.7 (6.8) and 12.6 (5.6) on prone non-Trig-MRI to 36.2 (12.2) and 32.7 (12.1) (both P < 0.01) on supine Trig-MRI. IS was similar: 0.10 (0) cm vs 0.11 (0) cm (P = 0.88).